linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] iio: document bindings for mounting matrices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdb1-d3mzJAs2AVdz3n8vWGy-cgajiTP4k=cJSqTsbgpeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 28 Jul 2019 12:07:44 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc:     "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Song Qiang <songqiang1304521@...il.com>,
        Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jmaneyrol@...ensense.com>,
        Martin Kelly <mkelly@...o.com>,
        Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
        Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>,
        Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
        Discussions about the Letux Kernel 
        <letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org>, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Gregor Boirie <gregor.boirie@...rot.com>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Samu Onkalo <samu.onkalo@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] iio: document bindings for mounting matrices

On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 9:50 AM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:

> Given the comments that 'need' any response are fairly minor, I've just
> taken the view that the perfect is the enemy of the good and applied
> it to the togreg branch of iio.git with some really small tweaks.

Oh that works, too :) whoever is most annoyed will get to fix any
remaining offenders.

The quality of documentation really depends on perspective.
This weekend I read some old UNIX System V manuals
and this was "extremly professional" documentation at one
point. It wasn't very good. I think we're pretty well off with what
we have here.

Yours,
Linus Walleij