[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190729001314.GA24747@embeddedor>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2019 19:13:14 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: signal: Mark expected switch fall-through
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warning:
arch/arm/kernel/signal.c: In function 'do_signal':
arch/arm/kernel/signal.c:598:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
restart -= 2;
~~~~~~~~^~~~
arch/arm/kernel/signal.c:599:3: note: here
case -ERESTARTNOHAND:
^~~~
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
arch/arm/kernel/signal.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
index 09f6fdd41974..ab2568996ddb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
@@ -596,6 +596,7 @@ static int do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs, int syscall)
switch (retval) {
case -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK:
restart -= 2;
+ /* Fall through */
case -ERESTARTNOHAND:
case -ERESTARTSYS:
case -ERESTARTNOINTR:
--
2.22.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists