[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201907290936.C5887FA6A7@keescook>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 09:36:58 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: signal: Mark expected switch fall-through
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 07:13:14PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warning:
>
> arch/arm/kernel/signal.c: In function 'do_signal':
> arch/arm/kernel/signal.c:598:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> restart -= 2;
> ~~~~~~~~^~~~
> arch/arm/kernel/signal.c:599:3: note: here
> case -ERESTARTNOHAND:
> ^~~~
>
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
-Kees
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/signal.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
> index 09f6fdd41974..ab2568996ddb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -596,6 +596,7 @@ static int do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs, int syscall)
> switch (retval) {
> case -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK:
> restart -= 2;
> + /* Fall through */
> case -ERESTARTNOHAND:
> case -ERESTARTSYS:
> case -ERESTARTNOINTR:
> --
> 2.22.0
>
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists