[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdapypySGPrLgSMSNy1fzkca2BfMUGzf3koFWQZ-M5VOvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 23:53:04 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
Cc: linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au> wrote:
> It's probably best if we push the three patches all through one tree rather
> than fragmenting. Is everyone happy if Joel applies them to the aspeed tree?
If you are sure it will not collide with parallell work in the
pinctrl tree, yes.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
(If it does collide I'd prefer to take the pinctrl patches and fix the
conflicts in my tree.)
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists