[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9d0f2b20-e6f6-419c-a866-c4a0dd92aa63@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:27:25 +0930
From: "Andrew Jeffery" <andrew@...id.au>
To: "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"Lee Jones" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Joel Stanley" <joel@....id.au>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles
On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 07:23, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au> wrote:
>
> > It's probably best if we push the three patches all through one tree rather
> > than fragmenting. Is everyone happy if Joel applies them to the aspeed tree?
>
> If you are sure it will not collide with parallell work in the
> pinctrl tree, yes.
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> (If it does collide I'd prefer to take the pinctrl patches and fix the
> conflicts in my tree.)
Fair enough, I don't know the answer so I'll poke around. I don't really mind
where the series goes in, I just want to avoid landing only part of it if I split it up.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists