linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <3691f6cb-2451-43f7-9f00-d5693071ba59@www.fastmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 01 Aug 2019 15:15:42 +0930
From:   "Andrew Jeffery" <andrew@...id.au>
To:     "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "Lee Jones" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "Joel Stanley" <joel@....id.au>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles



On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 10:27, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 07:23, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au> wrote:
> > 
> > > It's probably best if we push the three patches all through one tree rather
> > > than fragmenting. Is everyone happy if Joel applies them to the aspeed tree?
> > 
> > If you are sure it will not collide with parallell work in the
> > pinctrl tree, yes.
> > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> > 
> > (If it does collide I'd prefer to take the pinctrl patches and fix the
> > conflicts in my tree.)
> 
> Fair enough, I don't know the answer so I'll poke around. I don't 
> really mind
> where the series goes in, I just want to avoid landing only part of it 
> if I split it up.

Okay, it currently conflicts with my cleanup-devicetree-warnings series.

Joel, do you mind if Linus takes this series through the pinctrl tree, given
the fix to the devicetrees is patch 1/3?

Andrew