linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACPK8XcWK9Gf=pW5ds=3muoXHAWnyYfHcVSVh+anaTigtMO8yA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Aug 2019 06:15:01 +0000
From:   Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
To:     Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles

On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 05:45, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 10:27, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 07:23, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > > It's probably best if we push the three patches all through one tree rather
> > > > than fragmenting. Is everyone happy if Joel applies them to the aspeed tree?
> > >
> > > If you are sure it will not collide with parallell work in the
> > > pinctrl tree, yes.
> > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> > >
> > > (If it does collide I'd prefer to take the pinctrl patches and fix the
> > > conflicts in my tree.)
> >
> > Fair enough, I don't know the answer so I'll poke around. I don't
> > really mind
> > where the series goes in, I just want to avoid landing only part of it
> > if I split it up.
>
> Okay, it currently conflicts with my cleanup-devicetree-warnings series.
>
> Joel, do you mind if Linus takes this series through the pinctrl tree, given
> the fix to the devicetrees is patch 1/3?

It depends if you plan more changes to that part of the device tree
this merge window :)

Linus, perhaps the safer option is for me to take 1/3 through my tree
and you can take the rest through yours?

Cheers,

Joel