[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190801074203.76b439bd@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 07:42:03 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
To: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>, kernel@...labora.com,
Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Hertz Wong <hertz.wong@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] media: hantro: Add core bits to support H264
decoding
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 13:06:10 +0900
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:15 PM Boris Brezillon
> <boris.brezillon@...labora.com> wrote:
> [snip]
> > @@ -533,10 +535,21 @@ hantro_queue_setup(struct vb2_queue *vq, unsigned int *num_buffers,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > + /* The H264 decoder needs extra size on the output buffer. */
> > + if (ctx->vpu_src_fmt->fourcc == V4L2_PIX_FMT_H264_SLICE_RAW)
> > + extra_size0 = 128 * DIV_ROUND_UP(pixfmt->width, 16) *
> > + DIV_ROUND_UP(pixfmt->height, 16);
> > +
>
> I wonder if this shouldn't be accounted for already in the sizeimage
> returned by TRY_/S_FMT, so that the application can know the required
> buffer size if it uses some external allocator and DMABUF memory type.
> I know we had it like this in our downstream code, but it wasn't the
> problem because we use minigbm, where we explicitly add the same
> padding in the rockchip backend. Any thoughts?
Actually, I was wondering why it was not counted in ->sizeimage. I
thought you had a good reason to not expose the extra size to userspace
so I kept it like that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists