lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 1 Aug 2019 13:06:10 +0900
From:   Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
To:     Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>, kernel@...labora.com,
        Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>,
        Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Hertz Wong <hertz.wong@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] media: hantro: Add core bits to support H264 decoding

Hi Boris,

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:15 PM Boris Brezillon
<boris.brezillon@...labora.com> wrote:
[snip]
> @@ -533,10 +535,21 @@ hantro_queue_setup(struct vb2_queue *vq, unsigned int *num_buffers,
>                 return -EINVAL;
>         }
>
> +       /* The H264 decoder needs extra size on the output buffer. */
> +       if (ctx->vpu_src_fmt->fourcc == V4L2_PIX_FMT_H264_SLICE_RAW)
> +               extra_size0 = 128 * DIV_ROUND_UP(pixfmt->width, 16) *
> +                             DIV_ROUND_UP(pixfmt->height, 16);
> +

I wonder if this shouldn't be accounted for already in the sizeimage
returned by TRY_/S_FMT, so that the application can know the required
buffer size if it uses some external allocator and DMABUF memory type.
I know we had it like this in our downstream code, but it wasn't the
problem because we use minigbm, where we explicitly add the same
padding in the rockchip backend. Any thoughts?

Best regards,
Tomasz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ