[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190729224933.GA23686@embeddedor>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:49:33 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: Mark expected switch fall-through
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warning (Building: arm):
drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c: In function ‘dra7_efuse_xlate’:
drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c:79:20: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
calculated_efuse |= DRA7_EFUSE_HIGH_MPU_OPP;
drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c:80:2: note: here
case DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_OD_MPU_OPP:
^~~~
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
index 2ad1ae17932d..aeaa883a8c9d 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ static unsigned long dra7_efuse_xlate(struct ti_cpufreq_data *opp_data,
case DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_ALL_MPU_OPP:
case DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_HIGH_MPU_OPP:
calculated_efuse |= DRA7_EFUSE_HIGH_MPU_OPP;
+ /* Fall through */
case DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_OD_MPU_OPP:
calculated_efuse |= DRA7_EFUSE_OD_MPU_OPP;
}
--
2.22.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists