[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190730024146.46cqoyzxg6mjjc7k@vireshk-i7>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 08:11:46 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: Mark expected switch fall-through
On 29-07-19, 17:49, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warning (Building: arm):
>
> drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c: In function ‘dra7_efuse_xlate’:
> drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c:79:20: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> calculated_efuse |= DRA7_EFUSE_HIGH_MPU_OPP;
> drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c:80:2: note: here
> case DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_OD_MPU_OPP:
> ^~~~
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> index 2ad1ae17932d..aeaa883a8c9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ static unsigned long dra7_efuse_xlate(struct ti_cpufreq_data *opp_data,
> case DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_ALL_MPU_OPP:
> case DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_HIGH_MPU_OPP:
> calculated_efuse |= DRA7_EFUSE_HIGH_MPU_OPP;
> + /* Fall through */
> case DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_OD_MPU_OPP:
> calculated_efuse |= DRA7_EFUSE_OD_MPU_OPP;
> }
Applied. Thanks.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists