[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a16d9e6-0a9c-a0a8-3b11-d046247f3879@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:07:39 -0500
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, tiwai@...e.de,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vkoul@...nel.org, broonie@...nel.org,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, jank@...ence.com,
slawomir.blauciak@...el.com, Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC PATCH 17/40] soundwire: bus: use
runtime_pm_get_sync/pm when enabled
On 7/26/19 2:08 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 01:08:57PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>> This thread became unreadable with interleaved top-posting, allow me restate
>> the options and ask PM folks what they think
>>
>> On 7/25/19 6:40 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>>> Not all platforms support runtime_pm for now, let's use runtime_pm
>>> only when enabled.
>
> Just a side note below...
>
>>> - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(slave->bus->dev);
>>> - if (ret < 0)
>
> Here...
>
>>> - return ret;
>>> + if (pm_runtime_enabled(slave->bus->dev)) {
>>> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(slave->bus->dev);
>>> + if (ret < 0)
>
> ...and thus here...
>
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>> ret = sdw_transfer(slave->bus, &msg);
>>> - pm_runtime_put(slave->bus->dev);
>>> +
>>> + if (pm_runtime_enabled(slave->bus->dev))
>>> + pm_runtime_put(slave->bus->dev);
>>
>> This is option1: we explicitly test if pm_runtime is enabled before calling
>> _get_sync() and _put()
>>
>> option2 (suggested by Jan Kotas): catch the -EACCESS error code
>>
>> ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(slave->bus->dev);
>> - if (ret < 0)
>> + if (ret < 0 && ret != -EACCES)
>
> ...and here, the pm_runtime_put_noidle() call is missed.
yes but in the example you provided, they actually do more work than
just decrement the device usage counter:
static int
radeonfb_open(struct fb_info *info, int user)
{
struct radeon_fbdev *rfbdev = info->par;
struct radeon_device *rdev = rfbdev->rdev;
int ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(rdev->ddev->dev);
if (ret < 0 && ret != -EACCES) {
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(rdev->ddev->dev);
pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(rdev->ddev->dev);
return ret;
}
return 0;
}
unless I am missing something pm_runtime_put_noidle() and
_put_autosuspend() are not equivalent, are they?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists