linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 5/6] clk: imx8mq: Remove CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag for IMX8MQ_CLK_TMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 Jul 2019 07:49:43 +0000
From:   Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
To:     Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>
CC:     Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>,
        "rui.zhang@...el.com" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        "edubezval@...il.com" <edubezval@...il.com>,
        "daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
        "Angus Ainslie (Purism)" <angus@...ea.ca>,
        Carlo Caione <ccaione@...libre.com>,
        Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>,
        Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/6] clk: imx8mq: Remove CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag for
 IMX8MQ_CLK_TMU_ROOT

Hi, Daniel

> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 10:20 AM Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> > > > Your explanation makes a lot of sense. We will take care today of
> > > > Abel's patch.
> > > > What do you think about Fabio's patch? I also think this is a valid patch:
> > > >
> > <snip>
> >
> > >
> > > Hmm, when did Fabio sent out this patch? I can NOT find it...
> > > I also have a patch in this series (#4/6) doing same thing on July 5th...
> > >
> > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpa
> > >
> tchwork.kernel.org%2Fpatch%2F11032783%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Canso
> n.hu
> > >
> ang%40nxp.com%7C048d8695b3dc4ceef6bd08d713f55e8a%7C686ea1d3bc2
> b4c6fa
> > >
> 92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636999816880118674&amp;sdata=1HIMQ0l
> iKpEFS
> > > 6P2WSG%2FH9evspxIdxAvFmaklH1woDk%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >
> > He didn't send the patch yet. It was just a request for test here:
> >
> > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcode.
> > bulix.org%2Fpd88jp-
> 812381&amp;data=02%7C01%7Canson.huang%40nxp.com%7C0
> >
> 48d8695b3dc4ceef6bd08d713f55e8a%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c30163
> 5%7C0
> > %7C0%7C636999816880118674&amp;sdata=p70mgCDucCgLJ8TTRMn3a%2
> Fk68FXGQeiR
> > FR0fVSV7Jlo%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >
> > But, now I see is exactly like your patch here:
> 
> ... pressed send to early.
> 
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flkml.o
> rg%2Flkml%2F2019%2F7%2F5%2F19&amp;data=02%7C01%7Canson.huang%
> 40nxp.com%7C048d8695b3dc4ceef6bd08d713f55e8a%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6f
> a92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636999816880118674&amp;sdata=ciWj8y
> WPvkIZ5ni%2BohZuaqAXf9Pb2FCWhp9GQhpMwAY%3D&amp;reserved=0
> 
> We are all set then. Thanks Anson for clarifications!

Thanks, so we are all clear about this issue, need to wait thermal maintainer to review
the rest patch in this series, but I did NOT receive any response from thermal sub-system
maintainer for really long time, NOT sure when the thermal patches can be accepted.

Anson