lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190729081221.GA2523@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:12:21 +0200
From:   Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>
To:     Anson.Huang@....com
Cc:     rui.zhang@...el.com, edubezval@...il.com,
        daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
        kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com, mturquette@...libre.com,
        sboyd@...nel.org, l.stach@...gutronix.de, abel.vesa@....com,
        andrew.smirnov@...il.com, angus@...ea.ca, ccaione@...libre.com,
        leonard.crestez@....com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux-imx@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] thermal: qoriq: Add clock operations

Hi Anson,
On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 12:56:10PM +0800, Anson.Huang@....com wrote:
> From: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> 
> Some platforms like i.MX8MQ has clock control for this module,
> need to add clock operations to make sure the driver is working
> properly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> index 2b2f79b..0813c1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>  //
>  // Copyright 2016 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
>  
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
> @@ -72,6 +73,7 @@ struct qoriq_sensor {
>  
>  struct qoriq_tmu_data {
>  	struct qoriq_tmu_regs __iomem *regs;
> +	struct clk *clk;
>  	bool little_endian;
>  	struct qoriq_sensor	*sensor[SITES_MAX];
>  };
> @@ -208,6 +210,19 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return PTR_ERR(data->regs);
>  	}
>  
> +	data->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(data->clk)) {
> +		if (PTR_ERR(data->clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +		data->clk = NULL;
> +	}

Wouldn't devm_clk_get_optional make more sense?

> +
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(data->clk);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to enable clock\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
>  	qoriq_tmu_init_device(data);	/* TMU initialization */
>  
>  	ret = qoriq_tmu_calibration(pdev);	/* TMU calibration */
> @@ -235,6 +250,8 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	/* Disable monitoring */
>  	tmu_write(data, TMR_DISABLE, &data->regs->tmr);
>  
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(data->clk);
> +
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -250,14 +267,21 @@ static int __maybe_unused qoriq_tmu_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  	tmr &= ~TMR_ME;
>  	tmu_write(data, tmr, &data->regs->tmr);
>  
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(data->clk);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int __maybe_unused qoriq_tmu_resume(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	u32 tmr;
> +	int ret;
>  	struct qoriq_tmu_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(data->clk);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	/* Enable monitoring */
>  	tmr = tmu_read(data, &data->regs->tmr);
>  	tmr |= TMR_ME;

Apart from that it looks like what Fabio sent and what i tested so

Reviewed-by: Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>

Cheers,
 -- Guido

> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ