linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/6] clk: imx8mq: Remove CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag for IMX8MQ_CLK_TMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 Jul 2019 11:13:12 +0300
From:   Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>
To:     Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
Cc:     Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>,
        "rui.zhang@...el.com" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        "edubezval@...il.com" <edubezval@...il.com>,
        "daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
        "Angus Ainslie (Purism)" <angus@...ea.ca>,
        Carlo Caione <ccaione@...libre.com>,
        Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>,
        Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] clk: imx8mq: Remove CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag for IMX8MQ_CLK_TMU_ROOT

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 10:49 AM Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com> wrote:

> > We are all set then. Thanks Anson for clarifications!
>
> Thanks, so we are all clear about this issue, need to wait thermal maintainer to review
> the rest patch in this series, but I did NOT receive any response from thermal sub-system
> maintainer for really long time, NOT sure when the thermal patches can be accepted.

This is really unfortunate. I think it is safe to do a RESEND of the
patches as it has
been at least 3 weeks since your first send them.

Pick any reviewed-by you got and do a resend.