[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB3PR0402MB391682A6263D084198E12DB6F5DD0@DB3PR0402MB3916.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 08:40:39 +0000
From: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
To: Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>
CC: "rui.zhang@...el.com" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"edubezval@...il.com" <edubezval@...il.com>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"l.stach@...gutronix.de" <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>,
"andrew.smirnov@...il.com" <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
"angus@...ea.ca" <angus@...ea.ca>,
"ccaione@...libre.com" <ccaione@...libre.com>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/6] thermal: qoriq: Add clock operations
Hi, Guido
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 12:56:10PM +0800, Anson.Huang@....com wrote:
> > From: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> >
> > Some platforms like i.MX8MQ has clock control for this module, need to
> > add clock operations to make sure the driver is working properly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> > b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c index 2b2f79b..0813c1b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> > //
> > // Copyright 2016 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
> >
> > +#include <linux/clk.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > #include <linux/err.h>
> > @@ -72,6 +73,7 @@ struct qoriq_sensor {
> >
> > struct qoriq_tmu_data {
> > struct qoriq_tmu_regs __iomem *regs;
> > + struct clk *clk;
> > bool little_endian;
> > struct qoriq_sensor *sensor[SITES_MAX];
> > };
> > @@ -208,6 +210,19 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> > return PTR_ERR(data->regs);
> > }
> >
> > + data->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> > + if (IS_ERR(data->clk)) {
> > + if (PTR_ERR(data->clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > + data->clk = NULL;
> > + }
>
> Wouldn't devm_clk_get_optional make more sense?
Yes, looks like it is better, will fix it in V2.
>
> > +
> > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(data->clk);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to enable clock\n");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > qoriq_tmu_init_device(data); /* TMU initialization */
> >
> > ret = qoriq_tmu_calibration(pdev); /* TMU calibration */
> > @@ -235,6 +250,8 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_remove(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> > /* Disable monitoring */
> > tmu_write(data, TMR_DISABLE, &data->regs->tmr);
> >
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(data->clk);
> > +
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
> >
> > return 0;
> > @@ -250,14 +267,21 @@ static int __maybe_unused
> qoriq_tmu_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > tmr &= ~TMR_ME;
> > tmu_write(data, tmr, &data->regs->tmr);
> >
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(data->clk);
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static int __maybe_unused qoriq_tmu_resume(struct device *dev) {
> > u32 tmr;
> > + int ret;
> > struct qoriq_tmu_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >
> > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(data->clk);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > /* Enable monitoring */
> > tmr = tmu_read(data, &data->regs->tmr);
> > tmr |= TMR_ME;
>
> Apart from that it looks like what Fabio sent and what i tested so
>
> Reviewed-by: Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>
Thanks,
Anson
>
> Cheers,
> -- Guido
>
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists
> > .infradead.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flinux-arm-
> kernel&data=02%7C0
> >
> 1%7Canson.huang%40nxp.com%7C9263c240da82482af57908d713fc7d0b%7
> C686ea1d
> >
> 3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636999847472894624&sdat
> a=0YAlK
> > V8ZS37vHFz311nOdBP8qBbqisvjFBtaSS1PV9k%3D&reserved=0
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists