[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1564386957-22833-1-git-send-email-mojha@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:25:57 +0530
From: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
To: paulmck@...ux.ibm.com, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH] rcu: Fix spelling mistake "greate"->"great"
There is a spelling mistake in file tree_exp.h,
fix this.
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index af7e7b9..609fc87 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ static int rcu_print_task_exp_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp)
* other hand, if the CPU is not in an RCU read-side critical section,
* the IPI handler reports the quiescent state immediately.
*
- * Although this is a greate improvement over previous expedited
+ * Although this is a great improvement over previous expedited
* implementations, it is still unfriendly to real-time workloads, so is
* thus not recommended for any sort of common-case code. In fact, if
* you are using synchronize_rcu_expedited() in a loop, please restructure
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists