linux-kernel - [PATCH] rcu: Fix spelling mistake "greate"->"great"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:25:57 +0530
From:   Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
To:     paulmck@...ux.ibm.com, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH] rcu: Fix spelling mistake "greate"->"great"

There is a spelling mistake in file tree_exp.h,
fix this.

Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index af7e7b9..609fc87 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ static int rcu_print_task_exp_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp)
  * other hand, if the CPU is not in an RCU read-side critical section,
  * the IPI handler reports the quiescent state immediately.
  *
- * Although this is a greate improvement over previous expedited
+ * Although this is a great improvement over previous expedited
  * implementations, it is still unfriendly to real-time workloads, so is
  * thus not recommended for any sort of common-case code.  In fact, if
  * you are using synchronize_rcu_expedited() in a loop, please restructure
-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project