[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190730160221.GX14271@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 09:02:21 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
Cc: rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Fix spelling mistake "greate"->"great"
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 01:25:57PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> There is a spelling mistake in file tree_exp.h,
> fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
Queued, thank you very much!
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> index af7e7b9..609fc87 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> @@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ static int rcu_print_task_exp_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp)
> * other hand, if the CPU is not in an RCU read-side critical section,
> * the IPI handler reports the quiescent state immediately.
> *
> - * Although this is a greate improvement over previous expedited
> + * Although this is a great improvement over previous expedited
> * implementations, it is still unfriendly to real-time workloads, so is
> * thus not recommended for any sort of common-case code. In fact, if
> * you are using synchronize_rcu_expedited() in a loop, please restructure
> --
> Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
> Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists