lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 29 Jul 2019 16:22:58 +0530
From:   Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
To:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] locking/mutex: Use mutex flags macro instead of hard code value

Let's use the mutex flag macro(which got moved from mutex.c
to linux/mutex.h in the last patch) instead of hard code
value which was used in __mutex_owner().

Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
---
 include/linux/mutex.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mutex.h b/include/linux/mutex.h
index 79b28be..c3833ba 100644
--- a/include/linux/mutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/mutex.h
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ struct mutex {
  */
 static inline struct task_struct *__mutex_owner(struct mutex *lock)
 {
-	return (struct task_struct *)(atomic_long_read(&lock->owner) & ~0x07);
+	return (struct task_struct *)(atomic_long_read(&lock->owner) & ~MUTEX_FLAGS);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ