[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXmu8BtZ47AE-qo2bax9n1PyOM90yLSjkzE6rekbxv9zQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:09:20 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 3/5] lib/vdso/32: Provide legacy syscall fallbacks
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 2:39 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> To address the regression which causes seccomp to deny applications the
> access to clock_gettime64() and clock_getres64() syscalls because they
> are not enabled in the existing filters.
>
> That trips over the fact that 32bit VDSOs use the new clock_gettime64() and
> clock_getres64() syscalls in the fallback path.
>
> Add a conditional to invoke the 32bit legacy fallback syscalls instead of
> the new 64bit variants. The conditional can go away once all architectures
> are converted.
>
I haven't surveyed all the architectures, but once everything is
converted, shouldn't we use the 32-bit fallback for exactly the same
set of architectures that want clock_gettime32 at all in the vdso?
--Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists