lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 29 Jul 2019 21:27:44 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Jeffrin Jose T <jeffrin@...agiritech.edu.in>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        tobin@...nel.org, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] libata: zpodd: Fix small read overflow in
 zpodd_get_mech_type()

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 04:00:08PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 7/29/19 3:58 PM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 2:55 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7/29/19 3:47 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> >>> Jeffrin reported a KASAN issue:
> >>>
> >>>     BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in ata_exec_internal_sg+0x50f/0xc70
> >>>     Read of size 16 at addr ffffffff91f41f80 by task scsi_eh_1/149
> >>>     ...
> >>>     The buggy address belongs to the variable:
> >>>       cdb.48319+0x0/0x40
> >>>
> >>> Much like commit 18c9a99bce2a ("libata: zpodd: small read overflow in
> >>> eject_tray()"), this fixes a cdb[] buffer length, this time in
> >>> zpodd_get_mech_type():
> >>>
> >>> We read from the cdb[] buffer in ata_exec_internal_sg(). It has to be
> >>> ATAPI_CDB_LEN (16) bytes long, but this buffer is only 12 bytes.
> >>
> >> Applied, thanks.
> > 
> > Dropped my reviewed by tag. :(
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/22/865

Argh, sorry!

> I'll add it.

Thanks! :)

-- 
Kees Cook

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ