linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: meson: axg-audio: add g12a reset support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1jk1c0uh4a.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 Jul 2019 09:16:37 +0200
From:   Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Cc:     Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: meson: axg-audio: add g12a reset support

On Mon 29 Jul 2019 at 15:29, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:

> Quoting Jerome Brunet (2019-07-03 05:26:14)
>> @@ -1005,8 +1087,27 @@ static int axg_audio_clkc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>                 }
>>         }
>>  
>> -       return devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev, of_clk_hw_onecell_get,
>> -                                          data->hw_onecell_data);
>> +       ret = devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev, of_clk_hw_onecell_get,
>> +                                       data->hw_onecell_data);
>> +       if (ret)
>> +               return ret;
>> +
>> +       /* Stop here if there is no reset */
>> +       if (!data->reset_num)
>> +               return 0;
>> +
>> +       rst = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*rst), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +       if (!rst)
>> +               return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +       rst->map = map;
>> +       rst->offset = data->reset_offset;
>> +       rst->rstc.nr_resets = data->reset_num;
>> +       rst->rstc.ops = &axg_audio_rstc_ops;
>> +       rst->rstc.of_node = dev->of_node;
>> +       rst->rstc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>> +
>> +       return ret = devm_reset_controller_register(dev, &rst->rstc);
>
> IS this a typo? Just return devm instead?

Typo it is. Thanks for pointing it out.

>
>>  }
>>  
>>  static const struct audioclk_data axg_audioclk_data = {