[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3caa5b31-f5ed-98cd-2bdf-88d8cb837919@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:43:49 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@....com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Radim K <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>,
Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/16] RISC-V: KVM: Implement
KVM_GET_ONE_REG/KVM_SET_ONE_REG ioctls
On 29/07/19 13:56, Anup Patel wrote:
> The PC register represents program counter whereas the MODE
> register represent VCPU privilege mode (i.e. S/U-mode).
>
Is there any reason to include this pseudo-register instead of allowing
SSTATUS access directly in this patch (and perhaps also SEPC)?
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists