[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <520bd0f7367e77ffd2e0150187f6ffb64b0e8b71.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 23:06:22 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Fuqian Huang <huangfq.daxian@...il.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: use trace_printk rather than printk in drm_dbg.
On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 10:45 +0800, Fuqian Huang wrote:
> In drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ih.c,
> amdgpu_ih_process calls DRM_DEBUG which calls drm_dbg and
> finally calls printk.
> As amdgpu_ih_process is called from an interrupt handler,
> and interrupt handler should be short as possible.
>
> As printk may lead to bogging down the system or can even
> create a live lock. printk should not be used in IRQ context.
> Instead, trace_printk is recommended.
> Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/365835
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c
[]
> @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ void drm_dbg(unsigned int category, const char *format, ...)
> vaf.fmt = format;
> vaf.va = &args;
>
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "[" DRM_NAME ":%ps] %pV",
> + trace_printk(KERN_DEBUG "[" DRM_NAME ":%ps] %pV",
> __builtin_return_address(0), &vaf);
>
> va_end(args);
This makes all 4000+ drm_dbg/DRM_DEBUG uses emit
a trace_printk.
I suggest instead you make only the interrupt uses
use a different function and not drm_dbg.
Or maybe add an in_interrupt() check like
if (in_interrupt())
printk(KERN_DEBUG etc...)
else
trace_printk(etc...)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists