[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABXRUiSYbyb8+bsvCb_+n1kLEA_ZSFxR5D7c+qatrW9KPGmeqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 14:26:07 +0800
From: Fuqian Huang <huangfq.daxian@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: use trace_printk rather than printk in drm_dbg.
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> 於 2019年7月31日週三 下午2:06寫道:
>
> On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 10:45 +0800, Fuqian Huang wrote:
> > In drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ih.c,
> > amdgpu_ih_process calls DRM_DEBUG which calls drm_dbg and
> > finally calls printk.
> > As amdgpu_ih_process is called from an interrupt handler,
> > and interrupt handler should be short as possible.
> >
> > As printk may lead to bogging down the system or can even
> > create a live lock. printk should not be used in IRQ context.
> > Instead, trace_printk is recommended.
> > Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/365835
> []
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c
> []
> > @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ void drm_dbg(unsigned int category, const char *format, ...)
> > vaf.fmt = format;
> > vaf.va = &args;
> >
> > - printk(KERN_DEBUG "[" DRM_NAME ":%ps] %pV",
> > + trace_printk(KERN_DEBUG "[" DRM_NAME ":%ps] %pV",
> > __builtin_return_address(0), &vaf);
> >
> > va_end(args);
>
> This makes all 4000+ drm_dbg/DRM_DEBUG uses emit
> a trace_printk.
>
> I suggest instead you make only the interrupt uses
> use a different function and not drm_dbg.
>
> Or maybe add an in_interrupt() check like
>
> if (in_interrupt())
> printk(KERN_DEBUG etc...)
> else
> trace_printk(etc...)
I will send a v2 patch to fix this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists