lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87imri73dp.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:14:10 +0200
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
Cc:     Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: Don't need to wakeup vCPU twice afer timer fire

Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> writes:

> On 31/07/19 13:27, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
>> 
>> kvm_set_pending_timer() will take care to wake up the sleeping vCPU which 
>> has pending timer, don't need to check this in apic_timer_expired() again.
>
> No, it doesn't.  kvm_make_request never kicks the vCPU.
>

Hm, but kvm_set_pending_timer() currently looks like:

void kvm_set_pending_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
	kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_PENDING_TIMER, vcpu);
	kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
}

-- 
Vitaly

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ