linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ima: Allow to import the blacklisted cert signed by secondary CA cert

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1564700229.11223.9.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 01 Aug 2019 18:57:09 -0400
From:   Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Jia Zhang <zhang.jia@...ux.alibaba.com>, dhowells@...hat.com,
        dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com
Cc:     keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Mark D. Baushke" <mdb@...iper.net>,
        Petko Manolov <petkan@...-labs.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ima: Allow to import the blacklisted cert signed by
 secondary CA cert

Hi Jia,

On Thu, 2019-08-01 at 09:23 +0800, Jia Zhang wrote:
> Similar to .ima, the cert imported to .ima_blacklist is able to be
> authenticated by a secondary CA cert.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jia Zhang <zhang.jia@...ux.alibaba.com>

The IMA blacklist, which is defined as experimental for a reason, was
upstreamed prior to the system blacklist.  Any reason you're not using
the system blacklist?  Before making this sort of change, I'd like
some input from others.

thanks,

Mimi