lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <699614206.55882.1564652413789.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
Date:   Thu, 1 Aug 2019 11:40:13 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:     chengzhihao1 <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
Cc:     yi zhang <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
        linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 答复: 答复: [PATCH RFC] ubi: ubi_wl_get_peb: Replace a limited number of attempts with polling while getting PEB

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>> Do you have numbers how many attempts were needed to get a free block?
> I tested it dozens of times. The biggest number of attempts I've ever had so far
> is 6. In most cases, it only takes 2 or 3 times.

So raising the retry count to, let's say, 10 would work too?
Having it unbound feels dangerous because it may hide other problems.

Thanks,
//richard

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ