[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db5b56ff-c6e1-32a8-628c-13b42379c4cb@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 12:20:52 -0500
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tiwai@...e.de, broonie@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jank@...ence.com, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
slawomir.blauciak@...el.com, Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 19/40] soundwire: bus: improve dynamic debug comments
for enumeration
On 8/2/19 12:00 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 25-07-19, 18:40, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>> update comments to provide better understanding of enumeration flows.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/soundwire/bus.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
>> index bca378806d00..2354675ef104 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
>> @@ -483,7 +483,8 @@ static int sdw_assign_device_num(struct sdw_slave *slave)
>>
>> ret = sdw_write(slave, SDW_SCP_DEVNUMBER, dev_num);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> - dev_err(&slave->dev, "Program device_num failed: %d\n", ret);
>> + dev_err(&slave->dev, "Program device_num %d failed: %d\n",
>> + dev_num, ret);
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -540,6 +541,7 @@ static int sdw_program_device_num(struct sdw_bus *bus)
>> do {
>> ret = sdw_transfer(bus, &msg);
>> if (ret == -ENODATA) { /* end of device id reads */
>> + dev_dbg(bus->dev, "No more devices to enumerate\n");
>> ret = 0;
>> break;
>> }
>> @@ -982,6 +984,7 @@ int sdw_handle_slave_status(struct sdw_bus *bus,
>> int i, ret = 0;
>>
>> if (status[0] == SDW_SLAVE_ATTACHED) {
>> + dev_err(bus->dev, "Slave attached, programming device number\n");
>
> This should be debug level
yes, good catch, will fix.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists