lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190802172104.GA134279@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Aug 2019 18:21:04 +0100
From:   Alessio Balsini <balsini@...roid.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it, bristot@...hat.com, dvyukov@...gle.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, vpillai@...italocean.com, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 01/13] sched/deadline: Impose global limits on
 sched_attr::sched_period

Hi Peter,

This is indeed an important missing piece.

I think it would be worth having some simple checks, e.g.:
- period_min <= period_max;
- period_min >= (1ULL << DL_SCALE).

To be even more picky, I'm wondering if it would be a good practice to
fail the write operation if there are already dl-tasks in the system
that violate the new constraint.  I'm afraid there is no cheap way of
achieving such check, so, I think we can skip this last tricky thing for
now.

Thanks,
Alessio

On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 04:54:10PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
> Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/sched/sysctl.h |    3 +++
>  kernel/sched/deadline.c      |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>  kernel/sysctl.c              |   14 ++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/include/linux/sched/sysctl.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/sysctl.h
> @@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ int sched_proc_update_handler(struct ctl
>  extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_rt_period;
>  extern int sysctl_sched_rt_runtime;
>  
> +extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_dl_period_max;
> +extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_dl_period_min;
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK
>  extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min;
>  extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max;
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -2597,6 +2597,14 @@ void __getparam_dl(struct task_struct *p
>  }
>  
>  /*
> + * Default limits for DL period; on the top end we guard against small util
> + * tasks still getting rediculous long effective runtimes, on the bottom end we
> + * guard against timer DoS.
> + */
> +unsigned int sysctl_sched_dl_period_max = 1 << 22; /* ~4 seconds */
> +unsigned int sysctl_sched_dl_period_min = 100;     /* 100 us */
> +
> +/*
>   * This function validates the new parameters of a -deadline task.
>   * We ask for the deadline not being zero, and greater or equal
>   * than the runtime, as well as the period of being zero or
> @@ -2608,6 +2616,8 @@ void __getparam_dl(struct task_struct *p
>   */
>  bool __checkparam_dl(const struct sched_attr *attr)
>  {
> +	u64 period, max, min;
> +
>  	/* special dl tasks don't actually use any parameter */
>  	if (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_SUGOV)
>  		return true;
> @@ -2631,12 +2641,21 @@ bool __checkparam_dl(const struct sched_
>  	    attr->sched_period & (1ULL << 63))
>  		return false;
>  
> +	period = attr->sched_period;
> +	if (!period)
> +		period = attr->sched_deadline;
> +
>  	/* runtime <= deadline <= period (if period != 0) */
> -	if ((attr->sched_period != 0 &&
> -	     attr->sched_period < attr->sched_deadline) ||
> +	if (period < attr->sched_deadline ||
>  	    attr->sched_deadline < attr->sched_runtime)
>  		return false;
>  
> +	max = (u64)READ_ONCE(sysctl_sched_dl_period_max) * NSEC_PER_USEC;
> +	min = (u64)READ_ONCE(sysctl_sched_dl_period_min) * NSEC_PER_USEC;
> +
> +	if (period < min || period > max)
> +		return false;
> +
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@ -443,6 +443,20 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
>  		.proc_handler	= sched_rt_handler,
>  	},
>  	{
> +		.procname	= "sched_deadline_period_max_us",
> +		.data		= &sysctl_sched_dl_period_max,
> +		.maxlen		= sizeof(unsigned int),
> +		.mode		= 0644,
> +		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.procname	= "sched_deadline_period_min_us",
> +		.data		= &sysctl_sched_dl_period_min,
> +		.maxlen		= sizeof(unsigned int),
> +		.mode		= 0644,
> +		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec,
> +	},
> +	{
>  		.procname	= "sched_rr_timeslice_ms",
>  		.data		= &sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice,
>  		.maxlen		= sizeof(int),
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ