linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] Revert "mwifiex: fix system hang problem after resume"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 2 Aug 2019 19:02:52 -0700
From:   Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@...il.com>,
        Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@...vell.com>,
        Ganapathi Bhat <gbhat@...vell.com>,
        Xinming Hu <huxinming820@...il.com>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Revert "mwifiex: fix system hang problem after resume"

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 6:55 PM Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org> writes:
>
> > + Doug, Matthias, who are seeing problems (or, failure to try to
> > recover, as predicted below)
> > + Amit's new email
> > + new maintainers
> >
> > Perhaps it's my fault for marking this RFC. But I changed the status
> > back to "New" in Patchwork, in case that helps:
>
> But I still see it marked as RFC. So the patch in question is:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9657277/

Oops, I didn't hit the "Update" button :(

I changed it now, but I'll change it back again.

> Changing the patchwork state to RFC means that it's dropped and out of
> my radar. Also, if I see "RFC" in the subject I assume that's a patch
> which I should not apply by default.

Ack. Well, there were some "RFCs" I sent recently that you *did*
apply, so I didn't really know what happens normally.

> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 01:21:36PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
...
> > FWIW, I got an Acked-by from Amit when he was still at Marvell. And
> > another Reviewed-by from Dmitry. This still applies. Should I resend?
> > (I'll do that if I don't hear a response within a few days.)
>
> This patch is from 2017 so better to resend, and without RFC markings.

Yep, will do.

Brian