linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] Revert "mwifiex: fix system hang problem after resume"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <871ry3hufk.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Date:   Sat, 03 Aug 2019 05:08:47 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc:     Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@...il.com>,
        Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@...vell.com>,
        Ganapathi Bhat <gbhat@...vell.com>,
        Xinming Hu <huxinming820@...il.com>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Revert "mwifiex: fix system hang problem after resume"

Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org> writes:

>> Changing the patchwork state to RFC means that it's dropped and out of
>> my radar. Also, if I see "RFC" in the subject I assume that's a patch
>> which I should not apply by default.
>
> Ack. Well, there were some "RFCs" I sent recently that you *did*
> apply, so I didn't really know what happens normally.

True, I have sometimes applied RFC patches in case they look good enough
and I do not want them to get lost (and this is a good example of RFC
patches getting lost). But by default I drop RFC patches after a quick
glance.

>> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 01:21:36PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> ...
>> > FWIW, I got an Acked-by from Amit when he was still at Marvell. And
>> > another Reviewed-by from Dmitry. This still applies. Should I resend?
>> > (I'll do that if I don't hear a response within a few days.)
>>
>> This patch is from 2017 so better to resend, and without RFC markings.
>
> Yep, will do.

Thanks.

-- 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches