[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53e18a01-3d08-3023-374f-2c712c4ee9ea@fb.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2019 04:48:27 +0000
From: Tao Ren <taoren@...com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
CC: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Arun Parameswaran <arun.parameswaran@...adcom.com>,
Justin Chen <justinpopo6@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org" <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: phy: broadcom: add 1000Base-X support
for BCM54616S
Hi Vladimir,
On 8/3/19 6:49 AM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Hi Tao,
>
> On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 at 00:56, Tao Ren <taoren@...com> wrote:
>>
>> genphy_read_status() cannot report correct link speed when BCM54616S PHY
>> is configured in RGMII->1000Base-KX mode (for example, on Facebook CMM
>> BMC platform), and it is because speed-related fields in MII registers
>> are assigned different meanings in 1000X register set. Actually there
>> is no speed field in 1000X register set because link speed is always
>> 1000 Mb/s.
>>
>> The patch adds "probe" callback to detect PHY's operation mode based on
>> INTERF_SEL[1:0] pins and 1000X/100FX selection bit in SerDES 100-FX
>> Control register. Besides, link speed is manually set to 1000 Mb/s in
>> "read_status" callback if PHY-switch link is 1000Base-X.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tao Ren <taoren@...com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v3:
>> - rename bcm5482_read_status to bcm54xx_read_status so the callback can
>> be shared by BCM5482 and BCM54616S.
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Auto-detect PHY operation mode instead of passing DT node.
>> - move PHY mode auto-detect logic from config_init to probe callback.
>> - only set speed (not including duplex) in read_status callback.
>> - update patch description with more background to avoid confusion.
>> - patch #1 in the series ("net: phy: broadcom: set features explicitly
>> for BCM54616") is dropped: the fix should go to get_features callback
>> which may potentially depend on this patch.
>>
>> drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> include/linux/brcmphy.h | 10 ++++++++--
>> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c b/drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c
>> index 937d0059e8ac..ecad8a201a09 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c
>> @@ -383,9 +383,9 @@ static int bcm5482_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> /*
>> * Select 1000BASE-X register set (primary SerDes)
>> */
>> - reg = bcm_phy_read_shadow(phydev, BCM5482_SHD_MODE);
>> - bcm_phy_write_shadow(phydev, BCM5482_SHD_MODE,
>> - reg | BCM5482_SHD_MODE_1000BX);
>> + reg = bcm_phy_read_shadow(phydev, BCM54XX_SHD_MODE);
>> + bcm_phy_write_shadow(phydev, BCM54XX_SHD_MODE,
>> + reg | BCM54XX_SHD_MODE_1000BX);
>>
>> /*
>> * LED1=ACTIVITYLED, LED3=LINKSPD[2]
>> @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ static int bcm5482_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> -static int bcm5482_read_status(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> +static int bcm54xx_read_status(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> {
>> int err;
>>
>> @@ -464,6 +464,35 @@ static int bcm54616s_config_aneg(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static int bcm54616s_probe(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> +{
>> + int val, intf_sel;
>> +
>> + val = bcm_phy_read_shadow(phydev, BCM54XX_SHD_MODE);
>> + if (val < 0)
>> + return val;
>> +
>> + /* The PHY is strapped in RGMII to fiber mode when INTERF_SEL[1:0]
>> + * is 01b.
>> + */
>> + intf_sel = (val & BCM54XX_SHD_INTF_SEL_MASK) >> 1;
>> + if (intf_sel == 1) {
>> + val = bcm_phy_read_shadow(phydev, BCM54616S_SHD_100FX_CTRL);
>> + if (val < 0)
>> + return val;
>> +
>> + /* Bit 0 of the SerDes 100-FX Control register, when set
>> + * to 1, sets the MII/RGMII -> 100BASE-FX configuration.
>> + * When this bit is set to 0, it sets the GMII/RGMII ->
>> + * 1000BASE-X configuration.
>> + */
>> + if (!(val & BCM54616S_100FX_MODE))
>> + phydev->dev_flags |= PHY_BCM_FLAGS_MODE_1000BX;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int brcm_phy_setbits(struct phy_device *phydev, int reg, int set)
>> {
>> int val;
>> @@ -655,6 +684,8 @@ static struct phy_driver broadcom_drivers[] = {
>> .config_aneg = bcm54616s_config_aneg,
>> .ack_interrupt = bcm_phy_ack_intr,
>> .config_intr = bcm_phy_config_intr,
>> + .read_status = bcm54xx_read_status,
>> + .probe = bcm54616s_probe,
>> }, {
>> .phy_id = PHY_ID_BCM5464,
>> .phy_id_mask = 0xfffffff0,
>> @@ -689,7 +720,7 @@ static struct phy_driver broadcom_drivers[] = {
>> .name = "Broadcom BCM5482",
>> /* PHY_GBIT_FEATURES */
>> .config_init = bcm5482_config_init,
>> - .read_status = bcm5482_read_status,
>> + .read_status = bcm54xx_read_status,
>> .ack_interrupt = bcm_phy_ack_intr,
>> .config_intr = bcm_phy_config_intr,
>> }, {
>> diff --git a/include/linux/brcmphy.h b/include/linux/brcmphy.h
>> index 6db2d9a6e503..b475e7f20d28 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/brcmphy.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/brcmphy.h
>> @@ -200,9 +200,15 @@
>> #define BCM5482_SHD_SSD 0x14 /* 10100: Secondary SerDes control */
>> #define BCM5482_SHD_SSD_LEDM 0x0008 /* SSD LED Mode enable */
>> #define BCM5482_SHD_SSD_EN 0x0001 /* SSD enable */
>> -#define BCM5482_SHD_MODE 0x1f /* 11111: Mode Control Register */
>> -#define BCM5482_SHD_MODE_1000BX 0x0001 /* Enable 1000BASE-X registers */
>>
>> +/* 10011: SerDes 100-FX Control Register */
>> +#define BCM54616S_SHD_100FX_CTRL 0x13
>> +#define BCM54616S_100FX_MODE BIT(0) /* 100-FX SerDes Enable */
>> +
>> +/* 11111: Mode Control Register */
>> +#define BCM54XX_SHD_MODE 0x1f
>> +#define BCM54XX_SHD_INTF_SEL_MASK GENMASK(2, 1) /* INTERF_SEL[1:0] */
>> +#define BCM54XX_SHD_MODE_1000BX BIT(0) /* Enable 1000-X registers */
>>
>> /*
>> * EXPANSION SHADOW ACCESS REGISTERS. (PHY REG 0x15, 0x16, and 0x17)
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>
> The patchset looks better now. But is it ok, I wonder, to keep
> PHY_BCM_FLAGS_MODE_1000BX in phydev->dev_flags, considering that
> phy_attach_direct is overwriting it?
I checked ftgmac100 driver (used on my machine) and it calls phy_connect_direct which passes phydev->dev_flags when calling phy_attach_direct: that explains why the flag is not cleared in my case.
Can you give me some suggestions since dev_flags may be override in other calling paths? For example, is it good idea to move the auto-detect logic from probe to config_init? Or are there other fields in phy_device structure that can be used to store PHY-switch link type? Or maybe I should just include the auto-detect logic in read_status callback?
Thanks,
Tao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists