linux-kernel - Re: [v4] net: can: Fix compiling warnings for two functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d928a635-accd-2a8f-1829-5d7da551a8e8@web.de>
Date:   Tue, 6 Aug 2019 13:37:42 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v4] net: can: Fix compiling warnings for two functions

>  v2->v3: change subject of patch.

Will it be nicer to use the word “compilation” in your patch subject?


>  v3->v4: change the alignment of two functions.

I would refer to an adjusted indentation.

How do you think about to omit “arrows” in these version identifications?

Regards,
Markus