linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: can: Fix compiling warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190806135231.GJ1974@kadam>
Date:   Tue, 6 Aug 2019 16:52:31 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Cc:     Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: can: Fix compiling warning

On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 10:10:20AM +0200, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> On 02/08/2019 05.36, Mao Wenan wrote:
> > There are two warings in net/can, fix them by setting bcm_sock_no_ioctlcmd
> > and raw_sock_no_ioctlcmd as static.
> > 
> > net/can/bcm.c:1683:5: warning: symbol 'bcm_sock_no_ioctlcmd' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > net/can/raw.c:840:5: warning: symbol 'raw_sock_no_ioctlcmd' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > 
> > Fixes: 473d924d7d46 ("can: fix ioctl function removal")
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
> 
> Thanks Mao!
> 
> Btw. what kind of compiler/make switches are you using so that I can see
> these warnings myself the next time?

These are Sparse warnings, not from GCC.

regards,
dan carpenter