lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0835B3720019904CB8F7AA43166CEEB2F18D0FFE@RTITMBSVM03.realtek.com.tw>
Date:   Fri, 9 Aug 2019 03:38:53 +0000
From:   Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
CC:     Maciej Fijalkowski <maciejromanfijalkowski@...il.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        nic_swsd <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 5/5] r8152: change rx_frag_head_sz and rx_max_agg_num dynamically

Jakub Kicinski [jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com]
[..]> The kernel could support it. And I has finished it.
> > However, when I want to test it by ethtool, I couldn't find suitable command.
> > I couldn't find relative feature in the source code of ethtool, either.

> It's possible it's not implemented in the user space tool 🤔
>
> Looks like it got posted here:
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg299877.html
>
> But perhaps never finished?

May I implement both sysfs and set_tunalbe for copybreak first
before the user space tool is ready? Otherwise, the user couldn't
change the copybreak now.

Best Regards,
Hayes

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ