[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190808.215133.2134703818400431096.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 21:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: hayeswang@...ltek.com
Cc: jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, maciejromanfijalkowski@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, nic_swsd@...ltek.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] r8152: change rx_frag_head_sz and
rx_max_agg_num dynamically
From: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 03:38:53 +0000
> Jakub Kicinski [jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com]
> [..]> The kernel could support it. And I has finished it.
>> > However, when I want to test it by ethtool, I couldn't find suitable command.
>> > I couldn't find relative feature in the source code of ethtool, either.
>
>> It's possible it's not implemented in the user space tool 🤔
>>
>> Looks like it got posted here:
>>
>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg299877.html
>>
>> But perhaps never finished?
>
> May I implement both sysfs and set_tunalbe for copybreak first
> before the user space tool is ready? Otherwise, the user couldn't
> change the copybreak now.
No, fix the tool please.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists