linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] xen/blkback: Use refcount

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 9 Aug 2019 09:12:04 +0800
From:   Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>
To:     Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
Cc:     Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xen/blkback: Use refcount_t for refcount

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 9:35 PM Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 09:11:00PM +0800, Chuhong Yuan wrote:
> > Reference counters are preferred to use refcount_t instead of
> > atomic_t.
> > This is because the implementation of refcount_t can prevent
> > overflows and detect possible use-after-free.
> > So convert atomic_t ref counters to refcount_t.
>
> Thanks!
>
> I think there are more reference counters in blkback than
> the one you fixed. There's also an inflight field in xen_blkif_ring,
> and a pendcnt in pending_req which look like possible candidates to
> switch to use refcount_t, have you looked into switching those two
> also?
>

I will switch those two in next version.

> Roger.