lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANhBUQ1rSUPsg+XddCQ4B=JiSA8VV+YkdC-pmgY25hFnvwdFcw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Aug 2019 09:12:04 +0800
From:   Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>
To:     Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
Cc:     Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xen/blkback: Use refcount_t for refcount

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 9:35 PM Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 09:11:00PM +0800, Chuhong Yuan wrote:
> > Reference counters are preferred to use refcount_t instead of
> > atomic_t.
> > This is because the implementation of refcount_t can prevent
> > overflows and detect possible use-after-free.
> > So convert atomic_t ref counters to refcount_t.
>
> Thanks!
>
> I think there are more reference counters in blkback than
> the one you fixed. There's also an inflight field in xen_blkif_ring,
> and a pendcnt in pending_req which look like possible candidates to
> switch to use refcount_t, have you looked into switching those two
> also?
>

I will switch those two in next version.

> Roger.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ