[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190809172906.GA21450@roeck-us.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 10:29:06 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>, od@...c.me,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] watchdog: jz4740: Driver update
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 06:55:26PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
>
> Le ven. 9 août 2019 à 18:52, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> a écrit :
> >On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:59:27PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This patchset comes from a bigger patchset that was cut in smaller
> >> pieces for easier integration to mainline.
> >> (The patchset was https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/27/1837)
> >>
> >> The reviews were kept since the code mostly didn't change. The
> >>exception
> >> is the use of device_node_to_regmap() in patch 2/3. This function was
> >> added in a prior patch, now merged in the MIPS tree.
> >>
> >> For that reason this patchset is based on the ingenic-tcu-v5.4 branch
> >>of
> >> the MIPS tree
> >> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mips/linux.git).
> >>
> >
> >What is the expectation here ? Should the series be sent upstream
> >through the watchdog tree, or through some other tree ?
>
> You can get it through the watchdog tree if you merge the ingenic-tcu-v5.4
> branch from the MIPS tree. If you'd rather not do that, I can get it merged
> through the MIPS tree.
>
I would prefer a merge through the mips tree.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists