[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1565372089.2091.4@crapouillou.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 19:34:49 +0200
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>, od@...c.me,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] watchdog: jz4740: Driver update
Le ven. 9 août 2019 à 19:29, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> a
écrit :
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 06:55:26PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>> Hi Guenter,
>>
>>
>> Le ven. 9 août 2019 à 18:52, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> a
>> écrit :
>> >On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:59:27PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> This patchset comes from a bigger patchset that was cut in
>> smaller
>> >> pieces for easier integration to mainline.
>> >> (The patchset was https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/27/1837)
>> >>
>> >> The reviews were kept since the code mostly didn't change. The
>> >>exception
>> >> is the use of device_node_to_regmap() in patch 2/3. This
>> function was
>> >> added in a prior patch, now merged in the MIPS tree.
>> >>
>> >> For that reason this patchset is based on the ingenic-tcu-v5.4
>> branch
>> >>of
>> >> the MIPS tree
>> >> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mips/linux.git).
>> >>
>> >
>> >What is the expectation here ? Should the series be sent upstream
>> >through the watchdog tree, or through some other tree ?
>>
>> You can get it through the watchdog tree if you merge the
>> ingenic-tcu-v5.4
>> branch from the MIPS tree. If you'd rather not do that, I can get
>> it merged
>> through the MIPS tree.
>>
> I would prefer a merge through the mips tree.
>
> Guenter
Ok; Can I get some signatures then? ;)
Thanks,
-Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists