[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <996bc110024500842a627ea75cb43b7cd00ef36c.camel@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 22:08:45 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc: linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh: kernel: disassemble: Mark expected switch
fall-throughs
On Sat, 2019-08-10 at 00:01 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Fix the following warnings (Building: defconfig sh):
[]
> diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/disassemble.c b/arch/sh/kernel/disassemble.c
[]
> @@ -477,6 +477,7 @@ static void print_sh_insn(u32 memaddr, u16 insn)
> case FD_REG_N:
> if (0)
> goto d_reg_n;
Might as well remove this if (0) goto,
remove the added comment
> + /* else, fall through */
> case F_REG_N:
> printk("fr%d", rn);
> break;
> @@ -488,6 +489,7 @@ static void print_sh_insn(u32 memaddr, u16 insn)
> printk("xd%d", rn & ~1);
> break;
> }
> + /* else, fall through */
> d_reg_n:
and remove this only use of d_reg_n
> case D_REG_N:
> printk("dr%d", rn);
> @@ -497,6 +499,7 @@ static void print_sh_insn(u32 memaddr, u16 insn)
> printk("xd%d", rm & ~1);
> break;
> }
> + /* else, fall through */
> case D_REG_M:
> printk("dr%d", rm);
> break;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists