[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1565594914-18999-4-git-send-email-appana.durga.rao@xilinx.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 12:58:32 +0530
From: Appana Durga Kedareswara rao <appana.durga.rao@...inx.com>
To: wg@...ndegger.com, mkl@...gutronix.de, davem@...emloft.net,
michal.simek@...inx.com
Cc: linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Appana Durga Kedareswara rao <appana.durga.rao@...inx.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] can: xilinx_can: Fix the data updation logic for CANFD FD frames
commit c223da689324 ("can: xilinx_can: Add support for CANFD FD frames")
is writing data to a wrong offset for FD frames.
This patch fixes this issue.
Reviewed-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com>
Reviewed-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <Shubhrajyoti.datta@...inx.com>
Signed-off-by: Appana Durga Kedareswara rao <appana.durga.rao@...inx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
---
drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c | 29 ++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
index 2d3399e..c9b951b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
@@ -66,8 +66,7 @@ enum xcan_reg {
#define XCAN_FRAME_DLC_OFFSET(frame_base) ((frame_base) + 0x04)
#define XCAN_FRAME_DW1_OFFSET(frame_base) ((frame_base) + 0x08)
#define XCAN_FRAME_DW2_OFFSET(frame_base) ((frame_base) + 0x0C)
-#define XCANFD_FRAME_DW_OFFSET(frame_base, n) (((frame_base) + 0x08) + \
- ((n) * XCAN_CANFD_FRAME_SIZE))
+#define XCANFD_FRAME_DW_OFFSET(frame_base) ((frame_base) + 0x08)
#define XCAN_CANFD_FRAME_SIZE 0x48
#define XCAN_TXMSG_FRAME_OFFSET(n) (XCAN_TXMSG_BASE_OFFSET + \
@@ -600,7 +599,7 @@ static void xcan_write_frame(struct xcan_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
if (priv->devtype.cantype == XAXI_CANFD ||
priv->devtype.cantype == XAXI_CANFD_2_0) {
for (i = 0; i < cf->len; i += 4) {
- ramoff = XCANFD_FRAME_DW_OFFSET(frame_offset, dwindex) +
+ ramoff = XCANFD_FRAME_DW_OFFSET(frame_offset) +
(dwindex * XCANFD_DW_BYTES);
priv->write_reg(priv, ramoff,
be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)(cf->data + i)));
@@ -816,10 +815,8 @@ static int xcanfd_rx(struct net_device *ndev, int frame_base)
struct net_device_stats *stats = &ndev->stats;
struct canfd_frame *cf;
struct sk_buff *skb;
- u32 id_xcan, dlc, data[2] = {0, 0}, dwindex = 0, i, fsr, readindex;
+ u32 id_xcan, dlc, data[2] = {0, 0}, dwindex = 0, i, dw_offset;
- fsr = priv->read_reg(priv, XCAN_FSR_OFFSET);
- readindex = fsr & XCAN_FSR_RI_MASK;
id_xcan = priv->read_reg(priv, XCAN_FRAME_ID_OFFSET(frame_base));
dlc = priv->read_reg(priv, XCAN_FRAME_DLC_OFFSET(frame_base));
if (dlc & XCAN_DLCR_EDL_MASK)
@@ -863,26 +860,16 @@ static int xcanfd_rx(struct net_device *ndev, int frame_base)
/* Check the frame received is FD or not*/
if (dlc & XCAN_DLCR_EDL_MASK) {
for (i = 0; i < cf->len; i += 4) {
- if (priv->devtype.flags & XCAN_FLAG_CANFD_2)
- data[0] = priv->read_reg(priv,
- (XCAN_RXMSG_2_FRAME_OFFSET(readindex) +
- (dwindex * XCANFD_DW_BYTES)));
- else
- data[0] = priv->read_reg(priv,
- (XCAN_RXMSG_FRAME_OFFSET(readindex) +
- (dwindex * XCANFD_DW_BYTES)));
+ dw_offset = XCANFD_FRAME_DW_OFFSET(frame_base) +
+ (dwindex * XCANFD_DW_BYTES);
+ data[0] = priv->read_reg(priv, dw_offset);
*(__be32 *)(cf->data + i) = cpu_to_be32(data[0]);
dwindex++;
}
} else {
for (i = 0; i < cf->len; i += 4) {
- if (priv->devtype.flags & XCAN_FLAG_CANFD_2)
- data[0] = priv->read_reg(priv,
- XCAN_RXMSG_2_FRAME_OFFSET(readindex) +
- i);
- else
- data[0] = priv->read_reg(priv,
- XCAN_RXMSG_FRAME_OFFSET(readindex) + i);
+ dw_offset = XCANFD_FRAME_DW_OFFSET(frame_base);
+ data[0] = priv->read_reg(priv, dw_offset + i);
*(__be32 *)(cf->data + i) = cpu_to_be32(data[0]);
}
}
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists