linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/5] can: xilinx_can: Fix FSR register FL and RI mask values for canfd 2.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1565594914-18999-5-git-send-email-appana.durga.rao@xilinx.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Aug 2019 12:58:33 +0530
From:   Appana Durga Kedareswara rao <appana.durga.rao@...inx.com>
To:     wg@...ndegger.com, mkl@...gutronix.de, davem@...emloft.net,
        michal.simek@...inx.com
Cc:     linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Appana Durga Kedareswara rao <appana.durga.rao@...inx.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] can: xilinx_can: Fix FSR register FL and RI mask values for canfd 2.0

For CANFD 2.0 IP configuration existing driver is using incorrect mask
values for FSR register FL and RI fields.

Signed-off-by: Appana Durga Kedareswara rao <appana.durga.rao@...inx.com>
Acked-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@...inx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
---
 drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c | 13 ++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
index c9b951b..4cb8c1c9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
@@ -123,8 +123,10 @@ enum xcan_reg {
 #define XCAN_IDR_RTR_MASK		0x00000001 /* Remote TX request */
 #define XCAN_DLCR_DLC_MASK		0xF0000000 /* Data length code */
 #define XCAN_FSR_FL_MASK		0x00003F00 /* RX Fill Level */
+#define XCAN_2_FSR_FL_MASK		0x00007F00 /* RX Fill Level */
 #define XCAN_FSR_IRI_MASK		0x00000080 /* RX Increment Read Index */
 #define XCAN_FSR_RI_MASK		0x0000001F /* RX Read Index */
+#define XCAN_2_FSR_RI_MASK		0x0000003F /* RX Read Index */
 #define XCAN_DLCR_EDL_MASK		0x08000000 /* EDL Mask in DLC */
 #define XCAN_DLCR_BRS_MASK		0x04000000 /* BRS Mask in DLC */
 
@@ -1138,7 +1140,7 @@ static int xcan_rx_fifo_get_next_frame(struct xcan_priv *priv)
 	int offset;
 
 	if (priv->devtype.flags & XCAN_FLAG_RX_FIFO_MULTI) {
-		u32 fsr;
+		u32 fsr, mask;
 
 		/* clear RXOK before the is-empty check so that any newly
 		 * received frame will reassert it without a race
@@ -1148,12 +1150,17 @@ static int xcan_rx_fifo_get_next_frame(struct xcan_priv *priv)
 		fsr = priv->read_reg(priv, XCAN_FSR_OFFSET);
 
 		/* check if RX FIFO is empty */
-		if (!(fsr & XCAN_FSR_FL_MASK))
+		if (priv->devtype.flags & XCAN_FLAG_CANFD_2)
+			mask = XCAN_2_FSR_FL_MASK;
+		else
+			mask = XCAN_FSR_FL_MASK;
+
+		if (!(fsr & mask))
 			return -ENOENT;
 
 		if (priv->devtype.flags & XCAN_FLAG_CANFD_2)
 			offset =
-			  XCAN_RXMSG_2_FRAME_OFFSET(fsr & XCAN_FSR_RI_MASK);
+			  XCAN_RXMSG_2_FRAME_OFFSET(fsr & XCAN_2_FSR_RI_MASK);
 		else
 			offset =
 			  XCAN_RXMSG_FRAME_OFFSET(fsr & XCAN_FSR_RI_MASK);
-- 
2.7.4