[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <da84c857-2c2d-29ec-5e72-e719277faa2d@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 14:15:05 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To: Max Staudt <max@...as.org>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de, schmitzmic@...il.com,
geert@...ux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ata/pata_buddha: Probe via modalias instead of
initcall
On 8/12/19 12:55 PM, Max Staudt wrote:
> Hi Bartlomiej,
>
> Thanks for your feedback!
Hi Max,
> On 08/12/2019 12:42 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>>
>> ide/buddha driver cannot be unloaded currently (it lacks module_exit()).
>>
>> [... snip ...]
>>
>> It should work exactly like the old code in case of X-Surf,
>> what do we need to release?
>
>
> So what shall I do? Once an X-Surf has been detected, we refuse to
> unload, and therefore we never have to release X-Surf resources?
> That would simplify things a lot.
Yes, it seems to be a simplest solution.
> What's a good way to do that, given that we now have module_exit()> defined and an exit function is void?
What about something like this:
static bool xsurf_present;
...
static int __init pata_buddha_late_init(void)
...
if (pata_buddha_probe(z, &xsurf_ent) == 0 &&
xsurf_present == false)
xsurf_present = true;
...
static void __exit pata_buddha_exit(void)
...
if (xsurf_present)
return -EBUSY;
...
?
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
Powered by blists - more mailing lists