linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the arm-soc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190814074730.402ec3ec@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 14 Aug 2019 07:47:30 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the arm-soc tree

Hi Arnd,

On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 21:35:58 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 4:28 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> >
> > Please do not split Fixes tags over more than one line.  Also, please
> > keep them with the rest of the other tags.  
> 
> Thanks for the report. How bad is this? Should I undo the merge and
> wait for an updated pull request?

Its probably ok to leave as long as lessons are learnt :-)

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped