linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the arm-soc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f4e0e924-03ea-bf63-85a0-5718874ceb38@st.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:44:07 +0200
From:   Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:     Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the arm-soc tree

Hi guys

On 8/13/19 11:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 21:35:58 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 4:28 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Please do not split Fixes tags over more than one line.  Also, please
>>> keep them with the rest of the other tags.
>>
>> Thanks for the report. How bad is this? Should I undo the merge and
>> wait for an updated pull request?
> 
> Its probably ok to leave as long as lessons are learnt :-)
> 

Sorry for my late answer.

Thanks Stephen for information. I'll take care next time before merging 
patches with "fixes" tag.

Arnd, no need to update the PR ?

regards

Alex