linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the arm-soc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:07:02 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the arm-soc tree

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 11:44 AM Alexandre Torgue
<alexandre.torgue@...com> wrote:
> On 8/13/19 11:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Arnd,
> >
> > On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 21:35:58 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 4:28 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Please do not split Fixes tags over more than one line.  Also, please
> >>> keep them with the rest of the other tags.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the report. How bad is this? Should I undo the merge and
> >> wait for an updated pull request?
> >
> > Its probably ok to leave as long as lessons are learnt :-)
> >
>
> Sorry for my late answer.
>
> Thanks Stephen for information. I'll take care next time before merging
> patches with "fixes" tag.
>
> Arnd, no need to update the PR ?

No, since it's already pulled, just leave it for this time.

    Arnd