lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 14 Aug 2019 06:35:51 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Alan Kao <alankao@...estech.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] riscv: clear the instruction cache and all
 registers when booting

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 09:00:14AM +0800, Alan Kao wrote:
> But it doesn't really mean that the running system has an FPU given CONFIG_FPU
> enabled.  Normally the existence of an FPU is checked in riscv_fill_hwcap by
> searching device tree, where the code looks like
> 
> 
> bool has_fpu = false; // this one is global
> ...
> #ifdef CONFIG_FPU
>         if (elf_hwcap & (COMPAT_HWCAP_ISA_F | COMPAT_HWCAP_ISA_D))
>                 has_fpu = true;
> #endif
> 
> 
> Or does CONFIG_FPU have a more intuitive meaning when CONFIG_M_MODE is enabled?

No, it doesn't..

> 
> > +	csrr	t0, CSR_MISA
> > +	andi	t0, t0, (COMPAT_HWCAP_ISA_F | COMPAT_HWCAP_ISA_D)
> > +	bnez	t0, .Lreset_regs_done

... which is why we have these few lines of code that check the
caps returns from the misa CSR, similar to the elf_caps check quoted
above.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ