[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <108ee2f9-75dd-b8ab-8da7-b81c17bafbf6@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 17:25:51 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org>, "Chao Yu" <chao@...nel.org>,
Miao Xie <miaoxie@...wei.com>, <weidu.du@...wei.com>,
Fang Wei <fangwei1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/2] staging: erofs: differentiate unsupported
on-disk format
On 2019/8/14 12:32, Gao Xiang wrote:
> For some specific fields, use ENOTSUPP instead of EIO
> for values which look sane but aren't supported right now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
A little bit confused about when we need to use ENOTSUPP or EOPNOTSUPP, I
checked several manual of syscall, it looks EOPNOTSUPP is widely used.
Thanks,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists