[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190814094943.GA17960@138>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 17:49:43 +0800
From: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
CC: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
Miao Xie <miaoxie@...wei.com>, <weidu.du@...wei.com>,
Fang Wei <fangwei1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/2] staging: erofs: differentiate unsupported
on-disk format
Hi Chao,
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 05:25:51PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019/8/14 12:32, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > For some specific fields, use ENOTSUPP instead of EIO
> > for values which look sane but aren't supported right now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
>
> > + return -ENOTSUPP;
>
> A little bit confused about when we need to use ENOTSUPP or EOPNOTSUPP, I
> checked several manual of syscall, it looks EOPNOTSUPP is widely used.
It seems that you are right, I didn't notice this.
Let me resend this patchset to fix them all...
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
>
> Thanks,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists